Mr. Gareth Jones.
Mr. Gareth Jones
whose savage murder roused the indignation of the
British community out East, had collected material for what promised
to be one of the best book ever written on the Pacific. The writer
was privileged hear Mr. Jones read extracts from his notes, and very
startling would his revelations have been, with all the interest of
Percy Fleming’s book, backed by a far deeper knowledge of political
affairs.
Mr. Gareth Jones
was a man of
really charming personality, and the gift of infectious good spirits
and happiness of disposition. He had an amazingly clever hand with
children, and could improvise fairy tales of a kind that held the
grown ups equally enthralled with their fancy and wit. In his last
adventure he must have taken such interest in his captors and their
ways, recognising fully that it was “all in the way of business,”
and have sought to preserve genuinely friendly relations. He would
be the first to see their point of view. Some of us will find it
hard to believe that it was just a crime either of callousness or of
sudden panic. That is not quite the way of Chinese brigands. Other
captives have been held for months and then released safe and sound,
after many threats and perils. But often with no great personal
feeling against their captors.
The
Hong Kong Critic
THE
HEART OF THINGS.
POLITICS AND THE MURDER OF A JOURNALIST
By R. T. BARRETT.
August 25th
1935
The callous murder
of Mr. Gareth Jones
sent a thrill of horror and indignation through the
British community out East. A good many of US in Hong Kong heard Mr.
Jones speak briefly and modestly, of his work with Mr. Lloyd
George, and most of us recognised in him one of the line of
gallant English adventurers, who take their lives in their hands,
and go out into the unknown and troubled places of the earth.
Long ago they were patriotic freebooters
like Drake, then they were explorers like Thomas Cook, than
Missionaries like Livingtone.
To-day there the news seekers—Percy
Fleming is just such another—the aviators and the camera men who go
unarmed to study tigers and headsmen in the interests of science.
To
those who read closely the negotiations
followed Mr. Jones’s capture, a sorry and sordid tale was revealed,
without one single relieving feature on any side. Very early it
became apparent that this young Englishman had been caught in
the swirl of troubled waters, and his chances of emerging alive.
If there had been the least honesty
generosity or goodwill in any quarter concerned, his release would
have been art easy matter. Supposing for the moment that Mr.
Gareth Jones was captured by genuine brigands of that the
evidence is not clear either way—what the brigands wanted was money
and arms. The trouble with dealing with black mailers is always that
when you fulfil your part of the bargain they cheat, leaving you
where you are and repeating the same demands with increased threats,
but Chinese brigands generally have a rough honesty, and the
probability is that if the ransom had been paid then the captive
would have been released.
There were two curious things about
the incident. The first
was the release of Dr. Mueller. It is very seldom that the
captive is so released. Of course the brigands, having their
Manchester Guardian and other works of reference, including
files of Hong Kong papers, may have known that in Mr. Jones they had
a well connected young man for whose safety every effort would be
made, while Dr. Mueller was a much less valuable captive. Somehow,
one doubts this astonishing prescience in simple minded brigands of
the demilitarized zone.
The second curious incident was the
readiness of the Chahar government to find the ransom any ransom
apparently up to $100,000. despite the fact that they had warned Mr.
Jones that they would not be responsible for his safety. And yet
that same government, while the negotiations were in progress,
truculently informing Nanking that its Treasury empty, and nothing
could be sent to the Central Government of China. A clear hint there
of several things, which need not be labored. All who follow affairs
in the North can read quite clearly.
.
Then there is the curiously vague and
muddled story of a Chahar official being actually sent.
The generous General Chu Teh-Chun ,
Chairman of the Chahar government is supposed to have actually sent
an emissary to the bandits, with an installment of $100,000.
Dr.Mueller reports, however, that the bandits never received the
money.
It is very curious, too, that no efforts
to get the ransom were made from the British side. It is utterly
unreasonable to suppose that his father would not have been ready to
help, that Mr. Lloyd George, who evidently had a deep affection for
him, and is one of the most generous of men, would not have helped,
and even the old Foreign Office itself would have done something
more than send an assistant attaché to "do what he could. There is
something strange here, for normally kidapping is impelled by one
reason only, namely money, and in China the game is quite
systematised and ought to have been played without any difficulty.
It is easy to theorise, all may have been honest and above board,
but it has not got that appearance.
Whether that is so or not, it is quite
certain that contact with Mr. Jones was lost, that the negotiations
were bungled, that he was taken over the Jehol border and passed on
to another band. These bandits proceeded to make impossible demands
and then on being attacked turned on him.
Reuter gives a final "explanation of the
crime". The district magistrate who was conducting the negotiations
in their final stage, did not inform his next door colleague of what
was going on. All that that conscientious worthy knew was that the
brigands were entering his territory, so, very dutifully, he sent
his troops to attack them. This made the honest brigands doubt the
sincerity of the negotiations, so they took the straightforward
course of murdering this young man who was proving more of a
liability than an asset.
What else could one expect them to do?
Reuter of course knows that this
is all arrant nonsense as any of us, that a Chinese official
keeps his post by knowing exactly what is happening all round him,
and playing the correct moves on the complicated chessboard of
Chinese political intrigue. A false move, a lack of knowledge and
he, and his family will very soon be chucked out of the lucrative
gold mine called public office. In other words Reuter is saying that
Mr. Jones was a victim of oriental intrigue.
It is easy to see that there is more to
the incident than the petty avarice of brigands, and the possible
peculation of ransom money.
Already the Chinese are accusing the
Manchukuo authorities of deliberately obstructing the negotiations.
It is quite obvious that efforts were
made to create another international incident.
It is the object of the Chinese to show
that the demilitarised zone is a nest of brigandage in which, owing
to Japanese interference it is impossible to preserve any sort of
security. They wish also to show that in Manchukuo the same state of
affairs exists, and the so called efficiency and beneficence of
Japanese government are a fraud and a lie and conditions where they
govern are worse than in China. What better demonstration than the
capture and murder of this young Englishman, and all that went
between.
Nor can the Japanese have been blind to
the probable reactions between England and China. Here on the very
eve of the arrival of the Leith Ross Mission is an incident that
might rouse British resentment, and contribute that personal factor
which every now and then cuts right across the dehumanised interplay
of finance and commerce.
A firm will suddenly drop negotiations
with people that have committed a murder, and take an alternative
offer. Who knows, a real chance of putting a spoke in the British
wheel.
Thus we have Colonel Tan Takahashi, the
suave attaché, so prominent in the recent Northern crisis— the very
man who delivered an ultimatum expiring at midnight, which was to
have sealed the fate of Peiping — offering his services.
It may all have been genuine, the
efforts of the Charhar Government and the good offices of the
Japanese, but intrigue is so much part and parcel of the East that
no one believes that it was suddenly suspended, and replaced by
clear wells of sincerity.
Rival
Methods
What instruction there is in this
incident in the rival methods of Britain and China. Japan siezed
Manchuria because a Japanese staff officer travelling in the
interior disappeared and was murdered. Peiping and Tientsin were
almost taken because a party of Japanese officials were arrested and
detained a few hours by some minor official at Kalgan. The day
before the news of the murder of Mr. Jones was released, a single
shot was fired at a junk with Japanese notables on board, and flying
the Japanese flag.
An incident was threatened, but as it
happened none was needed at the time. A few weeks ago, a silly
article in a Chinese paper at Shanghai precipitated another crisis;
then a gunman’s crime aroused another!
England has tried the "gunboat policy",
and has decided that it has been found wanting.
At the time of writing there is talk of
a protest at the murder of Mr. Jones. If one is presented it will be
very mild, and apologetic. We shall make all the capital we can out
of our "reason and moderation," in a time of great difficulty to
Nanking.
Sir Frederick Leith Ross. is on the way.
Chinese opinion must be placated. Because a rash young man is killed
by brigands that is no reason why a contract for machinery, or
warships, or railway equipment should go elsewhere. Commercial
interests are involved, and that means not only individual profits
and directors fees, but work and wages for British labour.
A nice pass England has reached when the
livelihood of decent Britons depends upon whether British statesmen
can do the correct grovel and spread the correct palm oil among
Chinese "war lords" and politicians, whose corruption and
selfishness arc a bye-word among their own people. A nice pass when
we have to beg our bread from such folk.
In the eighteenth century Lord Macartney
seeking to further trade between great Britain and China refused to
kow-tow to the magnificent Emperor Kien Lung. In consequence his
mission did not do all that had been hoped.
England, however, got along quite well
despite the fact that he sacrificed pecuniary advantage to prestige.
We can imagine the instructions had he
been sent out on his mission to-day. "Kow-tow. Of course kow-tow.
You’ll damn well eat the dirt at the Emperor’s feet, and clean his
boots with your tongue, or stand on your head, or do anything else
he talk you, if you can get in return the concessions we want. You
can get on with it, or get out". Thus would speak that tightfisted
old god Avarice, whom we worship so blindly—that old god who
steals the living wage from British workmen with one hand, and
fosters every hit of dirty business out East with the other. If
business between England and China were clean there would be no
political trouble.
It would pity in the end if all shady
business were turned down. Firms who have acted on that principle do
well. Now and then they lose a hit here and there, but in the end
the clients worth having come back to them. This was to a large
extent the old, Victorian way, though no one claims it was 100 per
cent clean, but today, we all know the epithet which business has
attracted to itself in its scrounging this way and that.
The life of a gallant young Englishman,
who had already dared to expose the hell-black villainy of the
Russian government in concealing a famine, and dooming millions to
death, rather than cease export of grain, and call for foreign aid,
was nothing to "commercial interests at Home." He was a young fool
who had run his head into the noose, just as a generation ago
‘Chinese’ Gordon was an old fool and further back still, Clive a
disturber of the Peace, and of nabob profits.
But the nasty, flabby, old gentlemen,
who, for the sake of their profits, have made such havoc if the
world that statesmen must perforce seek any kind of business, no
matter how dirty, in order to keep their people in work will one day
be destroyed, and in England it is young men of the type of Gareth
Jones, who will accomplish the task. He was pursuing that task out
East, as he had pursued it in Russia, and he was one of those who
knew too much.
The story of one hand of brigands
handing the captive over to another group is yet another curious
feature. This second group is promptly extirpated except for one
wounded man, who produces just the story needed to give
verisimilitude to this bald and unconvincing narrative.
Life is cheap out cast, and so are lies,
and all that matters arc money and face. However, even if we have to
leave it at Nanking’s bland assurances, at least let it be known
that we know pretty well what happened.
Since this was written Dr. Mueller has
clinched our contention. No warning was given on the contrary a
permit was issue , and a route mapped out. No doubt what Dr Mueller
says will be either denied or disregarded, but once more it has been
said, "It is expedient, but the official pronouncement on the
consequences are not "believed to this day’."
|