HOME

Stop Press

Complete Soviet Articles & Background Information

Précis of Gareth's Soviet Famine Articles

All Published Articles

Tell Them We Are Starving

(2015)

Eyewitness to the Holodomor

(2013)

More Than Grain of Truth

(2005)

Manchukuo Incident

(2001)

'Are you Listening NYT?'  U.N. Speech - Nov 2009

Gareth Recognised at Cambridge - Nov 2009

Reporter and the Genocide - Rome, March 2009

Order of Freedom Award -Nov 2008

Premiere of 'The Living' Documentary Kyiv - Nov 2008

Gareth Jones 'Famine' Diaries - Chicago 2008

Aberystwyth Memorial Plaque 2006

Scholarship Fund

Site Map

Links

Legal Notices

Sponsored Links

Contact

THE WESTERN MAIL & SOUTH WALHTTP/1.1 100 Continue ES NEWS, Thursday June 8th 1933

(Germany Under Hitler - Fourth Article)

Worship of the Soldier Under the Nazi Regime

Hitler’s Policy “Towards the East"

By GARETH JONES

If you listen to the wireless in Germany today, you will hear in the intervals four notes being played time and again, and you find that it is the tune, “People to Arms! People to Arms!” which is being drummed into the ears and the minds of listeners. 

If you walk down a main street or enter a café you will be surprised at the number of people who have dug out their Iron Crosses from their store-places and now wear them proudly.

If you go to a cinema there is a good chance of your seeing a film depicting U-boat heroes setting forth to sink British vessels during the war or showing Frederick the Great, King of Prussia, scattering his enemies in the eighteenth century.  Another film you may see lauds brave Austrian mountaineers who hurl tons of rocks and stones from the hills upon the beads of Napoleonic invaders below. 

If you go to a theatre there is every likelihood of your seeing a row of French troops pointing their rifles at a German officer condemned to death in 1923, and of your hearing the German hero cry out, “Germany, awake!” before the French commander bids him go on his knees and the rifles spit out fire at their victim.

This German officer, Schlageter, who was shot by the French ten years ago for blowing up a bridge in the Ruhr, has become the symbol of Germany’s National Revolution, and the play, based upon his life, which ends in his being shot as he bends on his knees, rouses the most passionate of nationalist feelings in the young Germans who see it, and makes them feel that they also would willingly lay down their lives as soldiers in the national cause.

Urge for Army

The worship of the soldier is again being implanted in the minds of young Germans, and no nobler death is presented to them than death on the battlefield.  There is an urge, shared by almost all Germans, even by Socialists, to have a powerful army again, and this reverence for an army is typically described by Hitler in his autobiography when he writes: “What the German people owes to the Army can be summed -up in one word, namely, Everything,”

The supremacy of the military, the sight of thousands of uniforms, the drilling of the Brown Shirts, the resounding marches the fiery military songs which mainly spring from the victorious German War of Liberation against Napoleon, the cult of discipline rather than of freedom, all these features have led British people to say: “This is a mere return to pre-war Prussianism.  It is the Kaiser back in another form.”

Nothing could be further from the truth.  In Germany a real revolution has set up a State differing fundamentally from the Imperial Germany which went to its doom in 1918.  Some points are, of course, similar, and the love of leadership and the respect for the authority of the leading figure are reminiscent of the Germany of the Kaiser; but the differences between the two systems are striking and they are being brought to light by the quarrels between the Nazis and the German Nationalists, who are the adherents of Imperialism and Monarchy.

Revolutionary Régime

How does the Nazi régime differ from the old Prussianism of pre-war days?  It is above all a revolutionary régime depending mainly on youth, whereas the pre-war régime was an old man’s régime, where the colonel of sixty years of age was respected for his age and rank rather than for his brains, and where young people had little chance of promotion on account of the prevailing respect for years.

To-day youth is in the saddle and the older men are in the background. Typical of this is the way in which Hitler, who is in the forties, has put the octogenarian Hindenburg completely in the shade.

The Nazi revolutionary régime is bitterly opposed to the class differences of pre-war Germany, where peasants and nobles, workers and industrialists, soldier and Royal families built up the pyramid of a semi-feudal State.

The Nazis-in a rather vague way appeal for the abolition of class differences and the breaking down of the barriers of snobbishness.  Their slogan is “the spirit of the front-line trenches,” where they claim the differences between officers and men made place for a comradeship based on patriotism.  Thus, in the Brown Shirt Army the sons of the Kaiser are in principle on the same footing as the raw peasant recruit.

Poles Apart

Over the Monarchy the Nazis have a quarrel with the German Nationalists, and thus are poles apart from pre-war Prussianism.  The Steel Helmets (the army of the Nationalists) wish to bring in the Monarchy, but Hitler says that that question is not of importance at the minute and would rather let sleeping dogs lie.  The truth is that in the ranks of the Nazis there is great antagonism to Monarchy and certainly no love for the “old man of  Doom.” 

Even in the treatment of the Jews Hitler differs from the Kaiser, for Wilhelm II. was a friend of Jews and made use of their brains for the benefit of Germany.  The supporters of the pre-war policy, the German Nationalists, are opposed to Hitler’s persecution of the Jews and believe that it is doing immense harm to Germany.  Two German Nationalists with whom I traveled on a short journey pointed out to me: “It was a disgrace to have dismissed Einstein and some of the greatest Jewish doctors whose discoveries have saved thousands of lives.”  

Even in foreign policy Hitler has entirely opposite aims from the Kaiser.  The Kaiser said “Our future lies on the water.”  Hitler proclaims: “Our future lies in the East of Europe.”  The Kaiser’s policy was a’ world policy and aimed at the extension of colonies, of export trade, of international banking, and at domination of the high seas. 

Hitler’s Aims

Hitler aims at the very reverse.  He does not want to extend Germany’s power throughout the world, does not want a large Atlantic Navy, which would immediately antagonise England, neither does he want a large export trade.

He wants Germany to be a self-contained State extending towards the East at the expense’ of Poland.  He wishes to make Germany as independent of the world as possible. 

Towards the East!  That is his policy, and to carry out that policy, which means in the long run a war with Poland, he is determined to have~ a powerful army, a strong air force, and a modern Baltic fleet. Germany must expand and carry out the policy of conquering Eastern Europe, which was the Prussian policy of six centuries ago.

Although Hitler now desires peace, there is in the combination of his Eastern expansionist policy with his militarist training of youth, a profound danger to the peace of Europe in years to come. 

Home Policy

In home policy Hitler is a great contrast to the Kaiser.  Under the Kaiser Bavaria, Saxony, and the other parts of the Empire were kingdoms or duchies, enjoying considerable independence.  But Germans always longed for unity and looked with envious eyes upon Britain, which had been a united nation for centuries.

Thus Hitler through the National Revolution welded Germany into a unified structure and put an end to the measure of Home Rule enjoyed by the various States of Germany.  A Saxon said to me: 

“Bravo, Hitler!  He has made Germany one; and at last I can really say that I am a German first and foremost and not a Saxon.”

The greatest difference between Hitler’s policy and the Kaiser’s policy lies, however, in the attitude of the Nazis towards capitalism.  It is here that the most striking developments can be expected, for the Nazi party is by no means united on economic lines. 

There is the national wing and there is also a wing which wants to go rapidly towards Socialism.  Will there be a quarrel between the two wings?  Will the Nazis take openly anti-capitalistic measures? 

These are questions which can only be answered in the future, but already observers scent signs of National Bolshevism in Germany. 

Nazi cells have been set up in every factory and every office, and many of these cells have made their influence felt over the management and interfered with production. 

Will these cells take over production?  And will Germany thus become a National Bolshevist State?  One cannot yet say, but the formation of party cells and their interference in economic life are already mother proof of the gulf which separates the Germany of Hitler from the Germany of the Kaiser.

Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Germany.