Gareth Jones

[bas relief by Oleh Lesiuk]

BOOKS

TOPICAL

GENERAL

Chalet de la Colline,

Rossinieres,

Vaud,

Switzerland. 

April 17th 1933. 

Dear Gareth Jones, 

                        Thank you for your letter. I am glad you liked the M.G. articles. They were villainously cut. Duranty is, of course, a plain crook, though an amusing little man in his way. I broke finally with the M.G. [Manchester Guardian] over the Metrovick affair [6 British Vickers engineers arrested and put on show trial in 1933 in Moscow]. 

                        With all due respect to your divine L.G.  [Lloyd George] (whom as you know, I admire) it seems to me that the Liberal mind has now lost what qualities it once had – that is, a certain superficial integrity, and a capacity, in the last resort, to abandon its own pre-conceptions in the face of plain facts. Take, for instance, the Gladstone-Gordon affair. When the unfortunate Gordon was actually besieged in Khartoum, the Pious Incorruptible had to admit that the Mahdi was a brigand as well as a patriot, and that the British Government was under an obligation to do something about the matter. In the twilight of Liberalism, a man like the editor of the M.G. cannot even go that far. When Gordon’s throat is actually being cut, he still bleats – “We must still keep our heads; we mustn’t get excited; we must be conciliatory” and so on. As I wrote (in effect) to Crozier – “ You don’t want to know what is going on in Russia, and you don’t want your readers to know either; if the Metrovick people  had been Jews or Negroes, your righteous indignation would have been unbounded. You’d have published photographs of their lacerated backsides. They being just Englishmen, you refuse to publish the truth about their treatment or the general facts which make that truth significant, - and this when the M.G. is packed with stories of what the Nazis are doing to the Jews and the Poles to Ukranian [sic] and Silesian minorities.” 

                        I’m writing as much as I can. There’s an article coming out in the next number of the FORTNIGHTLY; and I’ve sent three articles to the WEEK-END REVIEW  which may or may not be used. Also, I sent an article to the TIMES about the position of foreign journalists in Russia. It hasn’t come back, so they may have used it. By the way I’d be grateful if you’d look for it, and let me have a cutting if it has, or does, appear. I don’t see the TIMES here. Also, it appears that the M.G. refused permission to the Ukranian [sic] Bureau to republish my articles as a pamphlet, so they’ve asked me to write a 3,000 word pamphlet for them. I’d very much like to see your articles on the agricultural situation before I do this because it would strengthen the thing for me to be able to quote someone else. Would you send them to me, or any sort of rough draft of them, from which I could quote? If you send me a cutting of Duranty’s piece, I’ll gladly write to the NEW YORK TIMES a letter of protest. I’m afraid I shan’t be in England for some time because I’ve got to get on with a book. And I’m hard up. When I am in England, however, I’ll be delighted to come to Cardiff and lecture. 

                        Yours 

                        Malcolm Muggeridge [signed]

Original Research, Content & Site Design by Nigel Linsan Colley. Copyright © 2001-17 All Rights Reserved Original document transcriptions by M.S. Colley.Click here for Legal Notices.  For all further details email:  Nigel Colley or Tel: (+44)  0796 303  8888